Re: [sigc] Deprecate retype() and retype_return() ? (original) (raw)
- From: Regis Duchesne
- To: Murray Cumming
- Cc: Libsigc++
- Subject: Re: [sigc] Deprecate retype() and retype_return() ?
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:46:09 +0000
In the whole VMware Workstation and VMware Fusion source code, we only have 6 occurrences of sigc::retype(), and zero occurrences of sigc::retype_return(). So as far as we are concerned, you can deprecate them, it will be easy for us to adapt. — hpreg
On Mar 3, 2016, at 2:31 PM, Murray Cumming wrote:
I am tempted to deprecate retype() and retype_return() because they don't seem widely useful and this would let us remove them one day, simplifying the code further. Or does anybody really use and love them?
pe.html#_details
-- Murray Cumming murrayc murrayc com www.murrayc.com
libsigc-list mailing list libsigc-list gnome org https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.gnome.org_mailman_listinfo_libsigc-2Dlist&d=BQICAg&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=dFLFi6i_LtRldFQy7tJ1rg&m=e58mpw8XsDtjs1UDpj0VB4Wd30nRzPKIvOnho37tJjU&s=if94eVOHiPCnvnFRU3H0edeEGPDT_IJOGwCOJrZIg9M&e=
- References:
- [sigc] Deprecate retype() and retype_return() ?
* From: Murray Cumming
- [sigc] Deprecate retype() and retype_return() ?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]