Fwd: Re: Why one can't submit an alternative thread pool to the streams API? (original) (raw)
edward edo3311 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 12 16:36:53 UTC 2019
- Previous message: Why one can't submit an alternative thread pool to the streams API?
- Next message: hg.openjdk.java.net too slow
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Subject: Re: Why one can't submit an alternative thread pool to the streams API? Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 18:35:55 +0200 From: edward <edo3311 at gmail.com> To: Cay Horstmann <cay.horstmann at gmail.com>
On 10/12/2019 5:52 PM, Cay Horstmann wrote:
There is a way to do it--see for example https://blog.krecan.net/2014/03/18/how-to-specify-thread-pool-for-java-8-parallel-streams/
It certainly isn't elegant. Perhaps a better way might be an argument to the parallel method that specifies the pool to be used? Il 12/10/19 17:41, edward ha scritto: One can't submit an alternative thread pool to the streams API. A default ForkJoinPool is used. Is there any good reason that is so or can I start working on it and propose JEP? Yes, you are right Cay and I am aware of that "way". I am just asking is it was some kind of design decision to omit this from streams API or simply no one thought about including such option?
- Previous message: Why one can't submit an alternative thread pool to the streams API?
- Next message: hg.openjdk.java.net too slow
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]