JavaFX and the Missing Interfaces (original) (raw)
Mark Fortner phidias51 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 5 12:41:31 PST 2012
- Previous message: JavaFX and the Missing Interfaces
- Next message: JavaFX and the Missing Interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I guess the benefit of doing it this way is that it would make it easier to swap out implementations, and do unit testing/mocking. The downside if the API is changing frequently then every release is liable to break something. But that's why people have continuous integration servers. :-)
Mark
Cheers,
Mark
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Daniel Zwolenski <zonski at gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe somebody can show how this would work in more concrete terms? I > don't even see how it would be practical at all. >
As in how it would be used by end developers and to what benefit, or as in how to make it workable in the current JFX codebase?
> Richard > > On Nov 5, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Zwolenski <zonski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I think we've had this conversation before. Maybe something to do with > interfaces being too brittle where if you add a method anyone implementing > it will now be missing a method, whereas with a base class they can add a > stub method? > > > > Other frameworks use interfaces extensively though (eg Spring, > java.util.Collections), generally with positive outcomes. > > > > > > > > On 06/11/2012, at 5:50 AM, Randahl Fink Isaksen <randahl at rockit.dk> > wrote: > > > >> I have been struggling with a number of problems stemming from the way > JavaFX is designed – specifically the lack of interfaces for many of the > extension points in the class hierarchy. > >> > >> It takes some thorough explaining with code examples, so instead of > just an unformatted e-mail I posted a more readable explanation of the > problem on-line: > >> Please read > http://blog.randahl.dk/2012/11/javafx-and-missing-interfaces.html > >> > >> I hope we could have a constructive discussion on this matter on this > list before I go ahead and file a Jira, so the Jira issue becomes the best > possible basis for solving the design problem. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> Randahl > >
- Previous message: JavaFX and the Missing Interfaces
- Next message: JavaFX and the Missing Interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]