[Numpy-discussion] Re: What am I missing about concatenate? (original) (raw)
Christopher Barker Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
Thu Jun 1 12:14:01 EDT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: What am I missing about concatenate?
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: What am I missing about concatenate?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks all,
Robert Kern wrote:
Look at vstack() (and also its friends hstack(), dstack() and columnstack() for completeness).
I like this, but need to keep Numeric/numarray compatibility for the moment -- I think, I've just sent out a query to my users.
Tim Hochberg wrote:
If you are using real arrays, use newaxis:
>>> a array([0, 1, 2]) >>> b array([3, 4, 5]) >>> concatenate([a[newaxis], b[newaxis]], 0) array([[0, 1, 2], [3, 4, 5]])
I like this, but again, not in Numeric -- I really need to dump that as soon as I can!
hate newaxis, wrap the arrays in [] to give them an extra dimension. This tends to look nicer, but I suspect has poorer performance than above (haven't timed it though):
>>> concatenate([[a], [b]], 0) array([[0, 1, 2], [3, 4, 5]])
Lovely. much cleaner.
By they way, wouldn't wrapping in a tuple, be slightly better, performance-wise (I know, probably negligible, but I always feel that I should use a tuple when I don't need mutability)
-thanks,
-chris
-- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer
NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: What am I missing about concatenate?
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: What am I missing about concatenate?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]