[Numpy-discussion] Don't like the short names like lstsq and irefft (original) (raw)
Alexandre Fayolle alexandre.fayolle at logilab.fr
Fri Jun 16 08:11:52 EDT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Don't like the short names like lstsq and irefft
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Don't like the short names like lstsq and irefft
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:43:42AM +0200, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Again, there is no defense for abbreviating linearleastsquares > because it is unlikely to appear in an expression and waste valuable > horisontal space.
not true imho; btw, I would suggest "ols" (ordinary least squares), which is in every textbook.
Please, keep the zen of python in mind : Explicit is better than implicit.
-- Alexandre Fayolle LOGILAB, Paris (France) Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian: http://www.logilab.fr/formations Développement logiciel sur mesure: http://www.logilab.fr/services Informatique scientifique: http://www.logilab.fr/science -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 481 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20060616/e85bc34f/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Don't like the short names like lstsq and irefft
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Don't like the short names like lstsq and irefft
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]