[Numpy-discussion] Numpy Benchmarking (original) (raw)
Keith Goodman kwgoodman at gmail.com
Tue Jun 27 19:55:53 EDT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Benchmarking
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Benchmarking
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 6/27/06, Dennis V. Perepelitsa <dvp at mit.edu> wrote:
I've run some benchmarks comparing the performance of scipy, numpy, Numeric and numarray vs. MATLAB.
I enjoyed looking at the results.
The most interesting result, for me, was that inverting a matrix is much faster in scipy than numpy. How can that be? I would have guessed that numpy handled the inversion for scipy since numpy is the core.
The two calls were scipy.linalg.inv(m) and numpy.linalg.inv(m).
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Benchmarking
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Benchmarking
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]