[Numpy-discussion] Numpy Benchmarking (original) (raw)
Robert Kern robert.kern at gmail.com
Tue Jun 27 22:40:46 EDT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Benchmarking
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Benchmarking
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Keith Goodman wrote:
Scipy computes the inverse of a matrix faster than numpy (except if the dimensions of x are small). But scipy is slower than numpy for eigh (I only checked for symmetric positive definite matrices):
Looks like scipy uses *SYEV and numpy uses the better *SYEVD (the D stands for divide-and-conquer) routine. Both should probably be using the RRR versions (*SYEVR) if I'm reading the advice in the LUG correctly.
-- Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Benchmarking
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Numpy Benchmarking
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]