[Numpy-discussion] [Possible UCE] Re: Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0 (original) (raw)
Sasha ndarray at mac.com
Fri Jun 30 18:31:45 EDT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] ***[Possible UCE]*** Re: Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 6/30/06, Travis Oliphant <oliphant at ee.byu.edu> wrote:
This is great. How did you generate [the coverage statistic]?
It was really a hack. I've configured python using
$ ./configure --enable-debug CC="gcc -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage" CXX="c++ gcc -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage"
(I hate distutils!)
Then I installed numpy and ran numpy.test(). Some linalg related tests failed which should be fixed by figuring out how to pass -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage options to the fortran compiler.
The only non-obvious step in using gcov was that I had to tell it where to find object files:
$ gcov -o build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.4/numpy/core/src numpy/core/src/*.c
... What happens if you run the scipy test suite?
I don't know because I don't use scipy. Sorry.
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] ***[Possible UCE]*** Re: Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]