[Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0 (original) (raw)
Travis Oliphant oliphant at ee.byu.edu
Fri Jun 30 19🔞22 EDT 2006
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sasha wrote:
On 6/30/06, Travis Oliphant <oliphant at ee.byu.edu> wrote:
... Yes, this is true, but the auto-generation means that success for one instantiation increases the likelihood for success in the others. So, the 26.7% is probably too pessimistic. Agree, but "increases the likelihood" != "guarantees".
Definitely...
The best solution would be to autogenerate test cases so that all types are tested where appropriate.
Right on again...
Here's a chance for all the Python-only coders to jump in and make a splash....
-Travis
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Time for beta1 of NumPy 1.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]