[Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct (original) (raw)
Charles R Harris charlesr.harris at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 16:02:33 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey <p.e.creasey.00 at googlemail.com
wrote:
+1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy, making a new thing just seems a bigger surface area to maintain. Personally I already assumed Scipy's "honour[ing] diversity in..." did not imply any protection of behaviours that violate the CoC itself, but if you wanted to be really explicit you could add "to the extent that these do not conflict with this code of conduct." to that line.
I prefer that to the proposed modification, short and sweet.
Chuck -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20180803/aefbeacb/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]