[Numpy-discussion] Adoption of a Code of Conduct (original) (raw)

Sebastian Berg sebastian at sipsolutions.net
Wed Aug 15 15:57:17 EDT 2018

On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 21:30 -0700, Ralf Gommers wrote:

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Charles R Harris <_ _charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, Peter Creasey <_ _> p.e.creasey.00 at googlemail.com> wrote: > > +1 for keeping the same CoC as Scipy, making a new thing just > > seems a > > bigger surface area to maintain. Personally I already assumed > > Scipy's > > "honour[ing] diversity in..." did not imply any protection of > > behaviours that violate the CoC itself, but if you wanted to be > > really explicit you could add "to the extent that these do not > > conflict with this code of conduct." to that line. > > I prefer that to the proposed modification, short and sweet. > This edit to the SciPy CoC has now been merged. It looks to me like we're good to go here and take over the SciPy CoC.

Sounds good, so +1.

I am happy with the committee as well, and I guess most/all are, but we might want to discuss it separately?

Cheers, Ralf

NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20180815/aaa3e9e7/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list