[Numpy-discussion] Revised NEP-18, array_function protocol (original) (raw)

Stephan Hoyer shoyer at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 20🔞28 EDT 2018

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:12 PM Marten van Kerkwijk < m.h.vankerkwijk at gmail.com> wrote:

For C classes like the ufuncs, it seems _self_ is defined for methods as well (at least, np.add.reduce._self_ gives np.add), but not a _func_. There is a _name_ (="reduce"), though, which means that I think one can still retrieve what is needed (obviously, this also means _arrayufunc_ could have been simpler...)

Good point!

I guess this means we should encourage using name rather than func. I would not want to preclude refactoring classes from Python to C/Cython. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20180628/34ba362f/attachment.html>

More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list