[Python-3000] how about switching to a preprocessor? (Re: A better way to initialize PyTypeObject) (original) (raw)
Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Sun Dec 3 02:13:42 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-3000] how about switching to a preprocessor? (Re: A better way to initialize PyTypeObject)
- Next message: [Python-3000] how about switching to a preprocessor? (Re: A better way to initialize PyTypeObject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mike Klaas wrote:
Reducing the pyrex magic and adding more detailed errors to the code generator should eliminate much of the "code-peering" that is currently necessary (at least, by me) when writing extensions.
Can you expand on that? What magic would you like to have removed, and what new error messages would you like to see?
-- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-3000] how about switching to a preprocessor? (Re: A better way to initialize PyTypeObject)
- Next message: [Python-3000] how about switching to a preprocessor? (Re: A better way to initialize PyTypeObject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]