[Python-3000] Python/C++ question (original) (raw)
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Mon Dec 11 13:33:24 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Python/C++ question
- Next message: [Python-3000] Modules with Dual Python/C Implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Dec 10, 2006, at 9:57 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Not having to repeat struct has no ABI impact. Yes! Switch to C++! Down with struct! No, I don't have anything useful to add to the discussion, in fact.
I know this has been discussed many times before and I know that
Guido is against the change. But I'll just add (again) that /
requiring/ C++ to build Python will cause some of us pain. Our
highly embedded/extended app has to twist and turn in order to link
against one external C++ library that really has no need being C++.
It's manageable on Windows and Linux, but some platforms (e.g. starts
with "so" and ends with "is") are really quite painful.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBRX1QIHEjvBPtnXfVAQIvdgP/dtRCeHuapv+SCidq1Rt2nuZyY48H/5AM qVKs/AYFGTZR8qYcEsTUb3LzLLxKDTG6DwVlld50YfEGmadIEgAgl7RUMGGfvvZ/ A7EdiD1dIkAO1pB5vXqPUS+u6fgYMERF4arY8QNMMK0/f0RSlNczl1X680M+4rR1 OSMyFCDGtow= =ZPmk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Python/C++ question
- Next message: [Python-3000] Modules with Dual Python/C Implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]