[Python-3000] [Python-Dev] PEP 30XZ: Simplified Parsing (original) (raw)
Steven Bethard steven.bethard at gmail.com
Wed May 2 20:45:38 CEST 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] PEP 30XZ: Simplified Parsing
- Next message: [Python-3000] [Python-Dev] PEP 30XZ: Simplified Parsing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5/2/07, Brian Harring <ferringb at gmail.com> wrote:
Personally, I'm -1 on nuking implicit string concatenation; the examples provided for the 'why' aren't that strong in my experience, and the forced shift to concattenation is rather annoying when you're dealing with code limits (80 char limit for example)-
dprint("depends level cycle: %s: " "dropping cycle for %s from %s" % (curframe.atom, datom, curframe.currentpkg), "cycle")
FWLIW, I pretty much always write this as::
msg = "depends level cycle: %s: dropping cycle for %s from %s"
tup = cur_frame.atom, datom, cur_frame.current_pkg, "cycle"
dprint(msg % tup)
But yes, occasionally I run into problems when the string still doesn't fit on a single line. (Of course, I usually solve that by shortening the string...) ;-)
STeVe
I'm not in-sane. Indeed, I am so far out of sane that you appear a tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity. --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
- Previous message: [Python-3000] PEP 30XZ: Simplified Parsing
- Next message: [Python-3000] [Python-Dev] PEP 30XZ: Simplified Parsing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]