[Python-3000] Revised PEP 3119 (Abstract Base Classes) (original) (raw)
Paul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Mon May 14 19:01:34 CEST 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Revised PEP 3119 (Abstract Base Classes)
- Next message: [Python-3000] Revised PEP 3119 (Abstract Base Classes)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 14/05/07, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
I'm not sure what language you would specifically like to see added to the PEP. "Recommendation for 3rd party frameworks: please don't use the stick approach." sounds a little strange. What's the point you're trying to get across?
Something like:
As a style issue, 3rd party code which wishes to use ABCs should follow the lead of the core and standard library, and be written in such a way as to allow, but not require, the use of ABCs.
But as I said, I'm coming to the view that worrying about such things is FUD. So I'm happy enough to relegate this sort of thing to possible a PEP 8 amendment if such an issue really does become a problem.
Paul.
- Previous message: [Python-3000] Revised PEP 3119 (Abstract Base Classes)
- Next message: [Python-3000] Revised PEP 3119 (Abstract Base Classes)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]