[Python-3000] PEP 3131 - the details (original) (raw)
Chris Monson shiblon at gmail.com
Fri May 18 04:09:52 CEST 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] PEP 3131 - the details
- Next message: [Python-3000] PEP 3131 - the details
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ignoring for a moment that prefix != reverse(postfix), that is....
:-)
- C
On 5/17/07, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> (there might be a need for it in RTL languages, supporting > 200E..200F and 202A..202E, but it seems that speakers of RTL > languages are skeptical about the entire PEP, so it's unclear > whether allowing these would help anything) The ideal kind of programming language for use by both LTR and RTL people would be some kind of RPN. Then the whole program could be read either way as either prefix or postfix. :-) -- Greg
Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000 at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/shiblon%40gmail.com
- Previous message: [Python-3000] PEP 3131 - the details
- Next message: [Python-3000] PEP 3131 - the details
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]