[Python-3000] Wither PEP 335 (Overloadable Boolean Operators)? (original) (raw)
Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Fri May 25 19:19:52 CEST 2007
- Previous message: [Python-3000] [Python-Dev] Wither PEP 335 (Overloadable Boolean Operators)?
- Next message: [Python-3000] Wither PEP 335 (Overloadable Boolean Operators)?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Greg Ewing" <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote in message news:4656446F.8030802 at canterbury.ac.nz... | Guido van Rossum wrote: || > Last call for discussion! I'm tempted to reject this -- the ability to | > generate optimized code based on the shortcut semantics of and/or is | > pretty important to me. || Please don't be hasty. I've had to think about this issue | a bit.
I have not seen any response to my suggestion to simplify the to-me overly baroque semantics. Missed it? Still thinking? Or did I miss something?
Terry Jan Reedy
- Previous message: [Python-3000] [Python-Dev] Wither PEP 335 (Overloadable Boolean Operators)?
- Next message: [Python-3000] Wither PEP 335 (Overloadable Boolean Operators)?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]