[python-committers] Commit rights to Ethan Furman (original) (raw)

Eli Bendersky eliben at gmail.com
Sat May 11 17:24:13 CEST 2013

Thanks, Brett!

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:

Ethan should now have commit rights and be subscribed to this list.

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks! > > I'll go ahead and point Ethan to the dev guide, so he'll send his SSH keys > to the appropriate place. Naturally I'm volunteering to mentor him in the > initial work he'll be doing as a Python core developer. We'll start with > getting an enum implementation committed (issue 17947). Since the > implementation will almost certainly be based in large parts on Ethan's > ref435 code, I think it's fair to let him commit that once it goes through a > review. > > P.S. code review of on issue 17947 will be very much appreciated! > > Eli > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: >> >> On 5/8/2013 4:44 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >> >> So I guess I can move forward with this unless there are objections in the >> next day or two, >> >> >> I have not responded before since Guido's approval seems sufficient ;-). >> The main concrete step is that one of the repository supervisors add his >> access key. >> >> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: >>> >>> On May 03, 2013, at 08:59 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >>> >>> >I'd like to propose to grant Ethan Furman commit rights. He's authored >>> > PEP >>> >309, >> >> >> 409, not 309: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0409/ >> >> >>> has been very helpful in the Enum saga (and is the de-facto author of >>> >the current reference implementation), >> >> >> You, Barry, and Guido, who have also worked on enum, know him best and are >> the principle supporters of this proposal. I gather that you all agree that >> he has shown the 'cooperativeness' necessary to a collective project. >> >> >>> and has also been active on the tracker for a couple of years (username >>> stoneleaf). >> >> >> As 'stoneleaf', he has been active on 12 issues since June 2010 (nosy on >> 2 more). One patch is open and 5 have been applied (3 by Nick, 1 each by >> Antoine and R. David), I would say that the enum code, which appears to be >> on the way to acceptance, is equivalent to a few more typical issue >> patches. >> >> FWIW, This is enough for a +1 from me. >> >> >>> I think he has already >>> >signed the contributor agreement, and explicitly expressed interest to >>> >contribute directly to PEP 435. >> >> >> That is the enum PEP. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0435/ >> I consider a (nontrivial) reference implementation to be a direct >> contribution even if he has not yet been pushing text changes. >> >> >>> >Any objections? >>> >>> +1 for Ethan. >> >> >> -- >> Terry Jan Reedy >> >> _>> ________________________ >> python-committers mailing list >> python-committers at python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers >> > > _> ________________________ > python-committers mailing list > python-committers at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20130511/c3b53005/attachment.html>

More information about the python-committers mailing list