[python-committers] How shall we conduct the Python 3.5 beta and rc periods? (Please vote!) (original) (raw)
Larry Hastings larry at hastings.org
Thu May 14 16:15:34 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] How shall we conduct the Python 3.5 beta and rc periods? (Please vote!)
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] How shall we conduct the Python 3.5 beta and rc periods? (Please vote!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05/12/2015 10:04 AM, Larry Hastings wrote:
What do you think? [...] Please cast your votes
workflow 0 1 2
Larry Hastings -0.5 1 0.5 Brett Cannon 0 1 0 Nick Coghlan 0 1 0 Chris Angelico 0 0 0 “in favor of [Workflow 1]” Ned Deily -1 1 -0.5 Barry Warsaw 0 0 0 “I'm fine with any of them as long as the workflow is well documented” Antoine Pitrou -0.5 1 0.5 Ethan Furman 0 1 0 didn't cast explicit votes for anything but workflow 1 Berker Peksag 0 1 0 Yuri Selivanov 0 1 0 didn't cast explicit votes for anything but workflow 1 Jesus Cea 0 1 0
total -2 9 0.5
I'm calling it--the winner by a landslide is the ambitious Workflow 1.
Barry and Chris A didn't cast any explicit votes, but both approved of
Workflow 1. Every other voter was +1 on Workflow 1 and uninterested or
negative on the others.
I'll start experimenting with the workflow(s) and will add documentation to the Dev Guide.
The fun starts next weekend,
//arry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20150514/469c8437/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] How shall we conduct the Python 3.5 beta and rc periods? (Please vote!)
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] How shall we conduct the Python 3.5 beta and rc periods? (Please vote!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]