[python-committers] Idea: Create subteams? (original) (raw)

Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Fri Apr 27 11:56:03 EDT 2018


On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 at 07:41 Victor Stinner <vstinner at redhat.com> wrote:

Ok, maybe asyncio is not a good candidate to experiment. I know that asyncio internals are complex, and asynchronous programming is hard.

Sure, the risk of regression in the Documentation is lower :-) But it doesn't mean that we should accept any change in the doc. I already saw people proposing to fix the doc, whereas they misunderstood something and the doc was plain right :-)

While I have no issue with the subteam concept (e.g. we have the import-team on GitHub that automatically get asked for PR reviews for relevant files), doing what you're asking will require some coding which is always hard to get people to do. ;)

The other option is we follow our own traditional practice of granting people commit rights for subsets of the code base and trust them to not overstep their comfort zones. I don't see why we can't do the same for documentation. If we trust them enough to change our docs then we should trust them enough to not touch C code unless they have the appropriate experience.

Victor 2018-04-26 16:31 GMT+02:00 Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:12 AM Victor Stinner <vstinner at redhat.com> wrote: > [..] >> I identified 3 obvious subteams: > >> * Documentation >> * IDLE >> * asyncio > > Sorry, asyncio isn't an obvious choice for me. There are not so many > low-hanging fruits left in asyncio except improvements to its > documentation. I'm a firm -1 to allow people to merge without Andrew's or > my review at this point, almost no PRs are fine when they are submitted > (including our own). There's a lot of complexity in asyncio which isn't > immediately evident to people who are not working with its internals on a > daily basis. > > Now, people who report and submit asyncio PRs seem to do that just fine > without subteams. Although it's rare to see people contributing more than > once, but that's not an asyncio-specific pattern, I see it in every big and > complex project I happen to contribute to. Even having a dedicated asyncio > mailing list doesn't help to get people to contribute to asyncio more > frequently. > > Don't get me wrong, Andrew and I would certainly welcome any help we can > get, but I'd be against running a public experiment with asyncio to see if > 2 of us can handle the management of the new sub-teams idea. Unfortunately > 2 of us just don't have capacity for that. > > Please pick another project for your idea. Maybe we should try it for > documentation first, where we have a lot of core devs who can help with PR > reviews and management of "subteams". > > Yury


python-committers mailing list python-committers at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20180427/d58fd0ef/attachment.html>



More information about the python-committers mailing list