[python-committers] Poll: Do you like the PEP 572 Assignment Expressions? (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Wed May 2 09:45:11 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] Poll: Do you like the PEP 572 Assignment Expressions?
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] Poll: Do you like the PEP 572 Assignment Expressions?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2 May 2018 at 19:49, Victor Stinner <vstinner at redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the talk at the Language Summit: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/ The poll is on the current PEP. I propose 4 choices: * +1: you like the PEP * -1: you dislike the PEP * 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon * don't reply to this poll :-)
-1 from me (on "too much pain for not enough gain" grounds).
Regards, Nick.
P.S. I quite liked the initial "expr as name" version with subscopes, but those aspects were changed based on reasonable concerns raised on python-ideas, and I think the discussion of the simplified proposal on python-dev has also raised sufficient further concerns to push the whole concept back into python-ideas territory. (I do think the discussions have clarified the nature of the cases where the current lack of any form of inline binding support can be genuinely irritating, though)
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20180502/3d12d4c6/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] Poll: Do you like the PEP 572 Assignment Expressions?
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] Poll: Do you like the PEP 572 Assignment Expressions?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]