[python-committers] A different way to focus discussions (original) (raw)
Serhiy Storchaka storchaka at gmail.com
Sat May 19 02:52:14 EDT 2018
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] A different way to focus discussions
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] A different way to focus discussions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
19.05.18 01:25, Guido van Rossum пише:
I wonder if it would make sense to require that for each PEP a new GitHub repo be created whose contents would just be a draft PEP and whose issue tracker and PR manager would be used to debate the PEP and propose specific changes.
This way the discussion is still public: when the PEP-specific repo is created the author(s) can notify python-ideas, and when they are closer to submitting they can notify python-dev, but the discussion doesn't attract uninformed outsiders as much as python-{dev,ideas} discussions do, and it's much easier for outsiders who want to learn more about the proposal to find all relevant discussion. PEP authors may also choose to use a different repo hosting site, e.g. Bitbucket or GitLab. We can provide a script that allows checking the formatting of the PEP easily (basically pep2html.py from the peps repo).
What will happen with these repos after accepting or rejecting corresponding PEPs?
- Previous message (by thread): [python-committers] A different way to focus discussions
- Next message (by thread): [python-committers] A different way to focus discussions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]