[Python-Dev] Lockstep iteration - eureka! (original) (raw)
Paul Prescod paul@prescod.net
Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:19:05 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Lockstep iteration - eureka!
- Next message: [*].items() (was: Re: [Python-Dev] Lockstep iteration - eureka!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Just van Rossum wrote:
... for indexing in : ...
Let me throw out another idea. What if sequences just had .items() methods?
j=range(0,10)
for index, element in j.items(): ...
While we wait for the sequence "base class" we could provide helper functions that makes the implementation of both eager and lazy versions easier.
-- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus "I don't want you to describe to me -- not ever -- what you were doing to that poor boy to make him sound like that; but if you ever do it again, please cover his mouth with your hand," Grandmother said. -- John Irving, "A Prayer for Owen Meany"
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Lockstep iteration - eureka!
- Next message: [*].items() (was: Re: [Python-Dev] Lockstep iteration - eureka!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]