[Python-Dev] Preventing recursion core dumps (original) (raw)
Just van Rossum just@letterror.com
Sat, 12 Aug 2000 12:51:31 +0100
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Core dump is dead, long live the core dump
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Preventing recursion core dumps
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
(Sorry for the late reply, that's what you get when you don't Cc me...)
Vladimir Marangozov wrote:
[Just] > Gordon, how's that Stackless PEP coming along? > Sorry, I couldn't resist ;-)
Ah, in this case, we'll get a memory error after filling the whole disk with frames
No matter how much we wink to each other, that was a cheap shot; especially since it isn't true: Stackless has a MAX_RECURSION_DEPTH value. Someone who has studied Stackless "in detail" (your words ;-) should know that.
Admittedly, that value is set way too high in the last stackless release (123456 ;-), but that doesn't change the principle that Stackless could solve the problem discussed in this thread in a reliable and portable manner.
Of course there's be work to do:
- MAX_RECURSION_DEPTH should be changeable at runtime
- str (and a bunch of others) isn't yet stackless
- ...
But the hardest task seems to be to get rid of the hostility and prejudices against Stackless :-(
Just
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Core dump is dead, long live the core dump
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Preventing recursion core dumps
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]