[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 285: Adding a bool type (original) (raw)
Mark McEahern marklists@mceahern.com
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 09:55:48 -0600
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[me]
This is Python with the PEP:
falseValues = [{}, [], 0, None, False] for x in falseValues: if not x: print "%s is 'false'." % x
[Fredrik Lundh]
can you explain how your second example covers everything that's in the PEP?
It doesn't cover everything in the PEP.
Here's how I think of the PEP:
With this PEP, we get to have our cake and eat it too:
1. There is one obviously correct way to return a truth value.
2. Polymorphous perversity with respect to truth still works.
What's everybody complaining about?
Cheers,
// mark
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 285: Adding a bool type
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]