[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited (original) (raw)
Alex Martelli aleax@aleax.it
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:07:53 +0200
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday 24 April 2002 07:02, Greg Ewing wrote: ...
There doesn't seem to be any single English word that captures all of what we mean without ambiguity.
Not a single VERB -- adjective "numbered" might do. Unfortunately the verb "to number" (from which the adjective comes as the past participle) is ambiguous when used as a function name (as noun "number" confusingly comes to mind instead, since it's an usage vastly more common).
Alex
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 279 revisited
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]