[Python-Dev] PEP 279 revisited (original) (raw)
Magnus Lie Hetland magnus@hetland.org
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:39:56 +0200
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 279 revisited
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 279 revisited
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org>:
See http://python.org/peps/pep-0279.html There's one nagging issue that I'd like to revisit. I think I still like the name itemize() better than enumerate(), even though itemize() reminds some people of items(). Somehow that doesn't strike me as a strong argument: the words look pretty different to me. I like itemize() better because (a) it's shorter, and (b) the LaTeX command "\itemize" can produce numbered lists (it can also produce bulleted lists). I'm ready to open this one for a vote. :-)
Well, the itemize environment can create any kind of list, but you'll have to number the items manually... ;)
How about enum()? That's short, and sort of in the traditoin of iter()... Can either be interpreted as a noun, an adjective, or a verb...
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
-- Magnus Lie Hetland The Anygui Project http://hetland.org http://anygui.org
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 279 revisited
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 279 revisited
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]