[Python-Dev] Re: OS/2 EMX changes to dynload_shlib.c (original) (raw)

Andrew MacIntyre andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:44:36 +1100 (EDT)

On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Guido Van Rossum wrote:

Given the number of OS/2 EMX specific changes to dynloadshlib.c, wouldn't it be better to create a separate dynloados2.c?

Its just occurred to me that you might in fact be referring to the changes to import.c, which were in the same commit (& thus the same checkin message) and were extensive. I did try to make it clear in the checkin message that changes to multiple files were committed.

It seems to be de rigeur to commit a single file at a time; something I hadn't appreciated and don't remember being advised about. I will follow this practive from now on.

-- Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..." E-mail: andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au | Snail: PO Box 370 andymac@pcug.org.au | Belconnen ACT 2616 Web: http://www.andymac.org/ | Australia