[Python-Dev] FW: METH_COEXIST (original) (raw)
Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Fri Dec 12 11:22:54 EST 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] FW: METH_COEXIST
- Next message: [Python-Dev] FW: METH_COEXIST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Raymond Hettinger" <python at rcn.com> writes:
Guido is basically okay with the idea but thought I should check here first to see if anyone has any profound thoughts about unexpected implications or perhaps a better way.
Not really, this sounds pretty reasonable. Two thoughts:
Man, I hate C. Not news :-)
/Might/ it be possible to do this automatically for a few slots? (i.e. are there any slots that have parameter lists that let the the tp_foo implementation function just be wrapped up in a METH_O or METH_NOARGS PyCFunction?). Bit of a hack, mind.
Cheers, mwh
-- Gullible editorial staff continues to post links to any and all articles that vaguely criticize Linux in any way. -- Reason #4 for quitting slashdot today, from http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/klee/misc/slashdot.html
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] FW: METH_COEXIST
- Next message: [Python-Dev] FW: METH_COEXIST
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]