[Python-Dev] Relative import (original) (raw)
Greg Ewing greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz
Wed Dec 17 17:36:36 EST 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Relative import
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Relative import
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at iinet.net.au>:
A: from absolute.dotted.name import foo B: from relative.dotted.name import bar C: from heirarchy.dotted.name import foobar D: from dotted.name import barfoo
Then Guido's migration plan would apply to the progression of the D semantics from the Python 2.3 model to being a shorthand for the absolute semantics. And once that has happened, then we could get rid of the 'absolute' version in the name of TOOWTDI.
That's where I disagree - I think that type C semantics should be the default/least ugly/easiest to get, not type A.
But I wouldn't like any of the others to be as ugly as those, either.
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Relative import
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Relative import
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]