[Python-Dev] Re: Relative import (original) (raw)
Paul Moore pf_moore at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Dec 18 09:03:26 EST 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Relative import
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Relative import
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> writes:
There are two proposals that I can live with: my original proposal with the leading dots counting the number of levels up, or the triple-dot proposal with scan-up semantics. In both cases, the default semantics would switch to absolute for Python 3.0.
If that's what you;d like a vote on, I prefer the triple-dot proposal. As far as semantics go, I have no opinion (I don't have any use for either option) but I really dislike the look of the single dot. I'm not a great fan of the triple dot, but it's the lesser of the two evils.
I have to admit to some confusion here, though. At the moment, the following works:
pkg\__init__.py:
print "importing pkg"
import a
pkg\a.py:
print "importing a"
import b
pkg\b.py:
print "importing b"
>>> import pkg
importing pkg
importing a
importing b
Is the proposal that any of this stop working? I assume not. Otherwise, I'm -1 on the whole thing. I see no reason to break this usage, and good reason (I can rename pkg - before final release, obviously - without needing to do a search-and-replace edit on everything in the package).
I think this whole thing needs a PEP, though. If only to be completely clear on what is and is not changing, and to record discarded options.
Paul.
This signature intentionally left blank
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Relative import
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Relative import
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]