[Python-checkins] Re: [Python-Dev] Re: python/dist/src/Objectsunicodeobject.c, 2.204, 2.205 (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at iinet.net.au
Fri Dec 19 07:54:16 EST 2003
- Previous message: [Python-checkins] Re: [Python-Dev] Re: python/dist/src/Objectsunicodeobject.c, 2.204, 2.205
- Next message: [Python-checkins] Re: [Python-Dev] Re: python/dist/src/Objectsunicodeobject.c, 2.204, 2.205
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Hudson wrote:
Hye-Shik Chang <perky at i18n.org> writes: [...]
BTW, do we really support architectures with 9bits-sized char? [...] I don't think we want to make the lives of people porting to such architectures any harder than it already is...
TI make chips where the smallest addressable unit is 16-bits and sizeof(char) == sizeof(int) == 16 bits == 1 byte due to the way the C standard is written.
I don't think Python is ported to any such chip at present (the one I use is a DSP, and I would seriously question the sanity of anyone who tried to run Python on one of these critters), but it's a possibility that shouldn't be ignored. Porting to such a machine would be rather entertaining (sizeof() gets a lot of work in the code for that DSP).
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | Brisbane, Australia Email: ncoghlan at email.com | Mobile: +61 409 573 268
- Previous message: [Python-checkins] Re: [Python-Dev] Re: python/dist/src/Objectsunicodeobject.c, 2.204, 2.205
- Next message: [Python-checkins] Re: [Python-Dev] Re: python/dist/src/Objectsunicodeobject.c, 2.204, 2.205
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]