[Python-Dev] Optimization targets - refcount (original) (raw)
Greg Ewing greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz
Sun Apr 18 05:23:15 EDT 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Optimization targets - refcount
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Optimization targets - refcount
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com>:
I'm not sure, however, that this would be common enough to be helpful. It seems to me PyINCREF should effectively translate to only a single machine instruction or two.
On a RISC architecture, probably 3 instructions -- load, increment, store.
It's the memory accesses that will be the most expensive part of this. But then, if increfing Py_None is really that common, its refcount will likely be in cache.
I doubt whether it really is very common, though, compared to increfs of all other objects.
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Optimization targets - refcount
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Optimization targets - refcount
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]