[Python-Dev] PEP 329: Treating Builtins as Constants in the Standard Library (original) (raw)
Phillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Mon Apr 19 09:30:55 EDT 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 329: Treating Builtins as Constants in the Standard Library
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 329: Treating Builtins as Constants in the Standard Library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 08:54 AM 4/19/04 -0400, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Comments are invited on a new pep:
I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for implementing this via a bytecode hack, rather than in the compiler or loading mechanisms. I think I'd rather see something like:
from __future__ import fast_globalswhich would mean that globals and builtins could be considered constants unless declared with 'global' at the module level. Then, the compiler could optimize any undeclared builtins, and the 'MAKE_FUNCTION' opcode could bind any constants defined as of the function's declaration.
Finally, the module object thus created would ban any setattr on any constant that has been bound into a function. (Since these are the only setattrs that could cause harm.)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 329: Treating Builtins as Constants in the Standard Library
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 329: Treating Builtins as Constants in the Standard Library
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]