[Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators (original) (raw)
Ronald Oussoren ronaldoussoren at mac.com
Thu Aug 5 22:16:16 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5-aug-04, at 22:11, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:54:17PM +0200, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
Not every method is a property accessor. The metaclass does calculate a default signature (all arguments are objects and the result is an object) when it doesn't have better information (such as the signature of a method with the same name in a superclass). Sorry I wasn't clearer. What I meant was if we have a nice syntax for setting function attributes then the metaclass to transform the functions just like a decorator could.
And how would that solve this: <http://www.eby-sarna.com/pipermail/peak/2004-July/001598.html>
Ronald
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]