[Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators (original) (raw)
Johannes Gijsbers jlg at python.org
Fri Aug 6 18:52:28 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 11:39:34 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
= wasn't bad at all. It also had a bullet list feel to it, but without the discomfort of using stars. This was my favorite of the alternatives.
'=' has too srong an association with assignment for me, The first thing I wondered was where the '=' was assigning to. Then I realized that, in the context of decorators, it has to be the function/method that follows. So in the following example:
=classmethod def foo(arg1,arg2): ...
'foo' '=' a classmethod. This does broaden the meaning of '=' from just equality of identity to belonging to a group, but that's mostly okay. However, the next example really bugs me:
=accepts(int,int) =returns(float) def bar(low,high): ...
'bar' '=' in no sense an 'accepts' or a 'returns'. It doesn't seem right to use an assignment operator for decorating.
Keeping Tim's comments about ':' in mind, my personal favorite is '|'.
Johannes
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]