[Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators (original) (raw)
Phillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Fri Aug 6 20:23:39 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 08:57 AM 8/6/04 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> So I spent a little time futzing with python-mode and some of my > decorator code, to try some alternative leading characters. Of the ones > that cannot be used in valid Python code today (i.e. no backward > compatibility issues), I tried ':', '/', '=', '*', and '|'.
If the community can rally behind one of these, I think that would be acceptable. They all seem arbitrary, but so is the choice of '@'. :-)
How about '%'? This:
%classmethod
looks more like some kind of pragma or compiler directive to me than '@', which looks more like some kind of documentation.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]