[Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators (original) (raw)
Roman Suzi rnd at onego.ru
Sun Aug 8 15:11:37 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, [ISO-8859-1] "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
Roman Suzi wrote:
As for the problems, I do not agree that decorators visually mix with arguments: it is not a problem with +-s and *-s in an expression or other similar cases. Also: heavily decorated function/method probably tells that something is wrong with it's design. There is another drawback of course: it does not have an implementation.
Well, GvR convinced me decorators-before-def are needed, thus leaving my proposal void.
However, I am not happy with those @s.
Regards, Martin
Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi
rnd at onego.ru == My AI powered by GNU/Linux RedHat 7.3
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]