[Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators (original) (raw)
Simon Percivall s.percivall at chello.se
Mon Aug 9 15:02:42 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2004-08-09, at 12.38, Walter Dörwald wrote:
I can't understand why we can't have a new keyword for decorators. If I remember correctly the introduction of yield didn't result in such a public outcry. We'd have to change our programs once if a variable names collides with the new keyword, but that's better than having to look at @s for the rest of our Python days.
So how about: make classmethod def foo(cls, bar): ...
I think "adorn" would make a better keyword in that case, as in "adorn with" this decorator the method foo.
//Simon
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]