[Python-Dev] Re: Decorators: vertical bar syntax (original) (raw)
Fernando Perez fperez528 at yahoo.com
Mon Aug 9 19:38:49 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Decorators: vertical bar syntax
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Decorators: vertical bar syntax
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum wrote:
Let's make one thing clear; while decorators may be useful for some to experiment with attaching signatures to methods, mainstream Python will eventually have optional static typing built in, and it won't use
I am immensely happy to hear this. I have read your old essay on the topic, but the long silence on this issue had me wondering whether it had been completely abandoned. I can't currently contribute to it, so I don't complain. But this is great news. Would you care to venture even a rough guess for when this might happen (and no, I'm not a lawyer, so you don't need a disclaimer in front :)?
From a scientific computing viewpoint, this is probably the single biggest stumbling point when using python today. We have scipy.weave, f2py and even manually written extension modules, which we all know how to use. But having optional static typing for the cases where python's dynamic nature is a cost with no benefit will be an incredible gain. Other methods always slow down the otherwise very fluid feel of using python, so having this as part of the language will be fantastic.
Best,
f
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Decorators: vertical bar syntax
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Decorators: vertical bar syntax
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]