[Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators (original) (raw)
Skip Montanaro skip at pobox.com
Tue Aug 10 14:56:09 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Walter> So how about:
Walter> make classmethod
Walter> def foo(cls, bar):
Walter> ...
I don't think anybody's come up with a candidate keyword that reads well in most/all situations. Consider:
make accepts(int, (int, float))
make returns(int)
def foo(arg1, arg2):
return arg1 * arg2
While you can contort "make" to mean what you want in this case it's clearly a much different meaning ("ensure that (or force) this function to accept and return these types) than "make classmethod" ("turn this function into a class method"). Other potential keywords have similar problems.
Skip
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]