[Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in builtin but aren't (original) (raw)
James Y Knight foom at fuhm.net
Tue Aug 10 18:17:14 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Aug 10, 2004, at 11:01 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
No, no, no! The "new" convention for built-in type names is all lowercase. CamelCaseType is old and only used in the context of types.py.
Sooo should (for 'generator' in objects that claim to be in builtins but aren't),
- 'generator' be added to builtins
- 'generator' be added to types.py and its module be set to 'types'
- 'generator' be added to .py and its module be set to '' (and a name for the module chosen)
James
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]