[Python-Dev] Re: Decorators after 'def' should be reconsidered (original) (raw)
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Thu Aug 12 21:47:41 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Decorators after 'def' should be reconsidered
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Weekly Python Bug/Patch Summary
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 15:14, Skip Montanaro wrote:
I think '*' is syntactically available for this use.
That was one of the characters I tried back when I was looking for @ alternatives. For some reason I can't explain, this one just rubs me the wrong way.
i'll-let-tim-psychoanalyze-the-reasons-why-ly y'rs, -Barry
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040812/5f6b69ed/attachment.pgp
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Decorators after 'def' should be reconsidered
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Weekly Python Bug/Patch Summary
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]