[Python-Dev] Re: def ... decorate (original) (raw)
Werner Schiendl ws-news at gmx.at
Fri Aug 13 19:52:48 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] def ... decorate
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: def ... decorate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Skip]
def pstatementexpr: staticmethod grammarrule('statement : expression') version("Added in 2.4") deprecatedmethod type(None) decorate (self, p): """docstring here""" print p[1]
was the following suggested already? (don't think so):
def p_statement_expr(self, p):
staticmethod
grammarrule('statement : expression')
version("Added in 2.4")
deprecatedmethod
type_(None)
body:
"""docstring here"""
print p[1]This would eliminate the problem of the moved parameters, yet keep all the pros you listed.
The docstring could allowed to be with the decorators so that all "meta-data" (from the perspective of a user) would be together.
/ Werner
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] def ... decorate
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: def ... decorate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]