[Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in builtin but aren't (original) (raw)
Brett C. bac at OCF.Berkeley.EDU
Sun Aug 15 22:09:48 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum wrote:
[SNIP]
Bah. The types module shouldn't be the "home" for any types -- it's just a collection of convenient aliases, and mostly they have the wrong names. It should be deprecated.
Well that settles that one. Didn't know you wanted to deprecate 'types'. Then builtin does seem to be the only logical place.
-Brett
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]