[Python-Dev] More concerns about decorators (original) (raw)
Roman Suzi rnd at onego.ru
Mon Aug 16 06:41:43 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Threading in the Standard Library Tour Part II
- Next message: [Python-Dev] More concerns about decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
After playing with decorators alittle I found that @-syntax is nearly optimal especially that it comes before def, but there are other things to keep in mind.
Decorators must transfer doc-strings and probably even add information about functions
As now functions could have arbitrary attributes, some mechanism must be in place to ensure this information is not lost. If it is purely up to the decorator to decide, we will end up with undocumented functions...
Is it possible to change function inplace? Is it even an option?
Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi
rnd at onego.ru == My AI powered by GNU/Linux RedHat 7.3
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Threading in the Standard Library Tour Part II
- Next message: [Python-Dev] More concerns about decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]