[Python-Dev] Re: decorators and 2.4 (original) (raw)
Jeff Bone jbone at deepfile.com
Sat Jul 3 08:04:40 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] useless question in bdist_wininst installers
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RE: [Python-checkins] python/nondist/sandbox/decimal libdecimal.tex, NONE, 1.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
+1
But only if semantically regarded by the language as literals rather than higher-order applications, as is (admittedly) implied if not explicit in the PEP.
jb
On Jun 29, 2004, at 8:34 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Barry Warsaw wrote:
I doubt he will respond. I think Guido has decided what the semantics will be and is just waffling over what syntax to choose. /I'm/ waiting for Tim to respond, because he'll get a clear image on his BCR (BDFL Channel Receptor) a few days before Guido makes up his mind and posts his pronouncement. I'm now hoping that he goes for the list-before-def approach, since Phillip seems to have shown that it would then be possible to: a) get to use decorators b) write backwards compatible code (albeit with a little magic to do so) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | Brisbane, Australia Email: ncoghlan at email.com | Mobile: +61 409 573 268
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jbone%40place.org
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] useless question in bdist_wininst installers
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RE: [Python-checkins] python/nondist/sandbox/decimal libdecimal.tex, NONE, 1.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]