[Python-Dev] Re: file() or open()? (original) (raw)
Bob Ippolito bob at redivi.com
Wed Jul 7 22:51:09 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: file() or open()?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: file() or open()?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
n Jul 7, 2004, at 4:46 PM, orbitz wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
"François Pinard" <pinard at iro.umontreal.ca> wrote in message news:20040707183033.GA30577 at alcyon.progiciels-bpi.ca...
I perceived the introduction of `file()' as a nice cleanup in Python. As a user, so did I. I like the cosistency of using file along with int, tuple, list, dict, type, (and did I leave out something), and all user classes as constructors of instances of themselves. I considered more as the action being performed. I'm opening something, in this case a file. And now I have an object which has been opened, I can perform operations on it, and when I'm done I close it.
But you also open sockets, pipes, applications, bank accounts, etc.
"open" seems seriously ambiguous to me, and it's not a "generic"
function like len or iter. The only good reason I see is to associate
"open" with files is because that's just how it's always been done in
Python and C.
-bob -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2357 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040707/6c5022c0/smime.bin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: file() or open()?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: file() or open()?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]