[Python-Dev] (class) module names clarification (original) (raw)
Jack Diederich jack at performancedrivers.com
Thu Mar 18 19:23:22 EST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] (class) module names clarification
- Next message: [Python-Dev] (class) module names clarification
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 06:07:05PM -0600, eric jones wrote:
>This would eliminate a whole class of errors where one writes code >assuming the import had the form "import StringIO" but it was actually >"from StringIO import StringIO"; or vice versa. > We've adopted this same coding standard for all our code at for this exact reason. We also use CamelCase for classes (although old SciPy code use lower case for everything), and lowercase for methods, variables, and functions exactly as you have advised. So, I'm all in favor of these becoming standard. :-) Our early modules had the Graph.Graph() naming problem. It took quite a few [brush] burns before the wisdom of plotting.Graph() sunk in. Now that SVN (which has proper renaming support) has hit 1.0 I'm looking forward to switching from CVS and doing:
svn commit -m "The Great Day of Renaming"
-jackdied
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] (class) module names clarification
- Next message: [Python-Dev] (class) module names clarification
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]